Supreme Court Orders Publication of Review Committee Orders Relating to Internet Shutdowns

The Supreme Court has held that review committee orders under the Telecom Suspension Rules, 2017 must be published, while deliberations of the review committee need not necessarily be notified.

26 February, 2024
3 min read


The Supreme Court of India has held that review orders relating to internet suspensions must be published, although the deliberations of the review committee need not be published. These observations were made in response to a miscellaneous application filed by the Foundation for Media Professionals (“FMP”) in the case of Foundation for Media Professionals v. Union Territory of Jammu (“4G Judgment”). This application sought to obtain the release of the findings of the review committee in accordance with the Supreme Court's ruling in Anuradha Bhasin v. Union of India.

Why should you care?

In Anuradha Bhasin v. Union of India, the Supreme Court ruled that orders instituting internet shutdowns must be published. This requirement also extends to the review committee under Rule 2(5) of the Temporary Suspension of Telecom Services (Public Emergency or Public Safety) Rules, 2017 (‘Telecom Suspension Rules’), serving as an oversight mechanism to ensure the legality and necessity of internet shutdowns. The lack of access to review committee orders hinders citizens' ability to challenge illegal and arbitrary internet shutdowns. Therefore, the publication of review committee orders is essential for fostering a culture of transparency and accountability.


On May 11, 2020, the Supreme Court delivered the 4G Judgment in a petition filed by the FMP seeking restoration of 4G mobile internet services in Jammu & Kashmir during the COVID-19 pandemic. The Supreme Court constituted a Special Committee comprising (i) Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs,  (ii) Secretary, Department of Telecommunications, and (iii) Chief Secretary, Government of Jammu & Kashmir to immediately review the 4G mobile internet ban. In particular, the Special Committee was directed to examine the material placed on record by all parties and consider the viability of less restrictive alternatives suggested by the petitioner.

Due to the unavailability of any information on the functioning of the Special Committee in the public domain, FMP was constrained to file a contempt petition. It is further important to mention that subsequent to the judgment, orders imposing internet suspension which had neither been reviewed by the review committee nor the Special Committee had also been passed. Aggrieved by how such restrictions on the internet were being imposed, without any sense of “emergency” or “urgency”, we filed a Miscellaneous Application on behalf of FMP seeking compliance with Anuradha Bhasin as well as the Telecom Suspension Rules.

Proceedings before the Supreme Court

On behalf of FMP, IFF filed a miscellaneous application seeking the publication of orders of the review committee passed in Jammu and Kashmir, which were being withheld from publication. Previously, in 2021, FMP had sent a legal notice to the Union Territory of Jammu and Kashmir seeking the publication of the orders of the review committee concerning a spate of internet suspensions in the UT.

On February 23, 2024, Mr. Shadan Farasat appearing on behalf of FMP argued that, according to Annruadha Bhasin v. Union of India, all orders under the Telecom Suspension Rules 2017 must be published. This requirement extends to review committee orders as well, which are currently not being published.

Mr. Tushar Mehta, Solicitor General, appeared on behalf of J&K  and opposed the publication of the same. At this point, Mr. Farasat submitted a compilation of review committee orders that were obtained by IFF through RTI requests, demonstrating that orders across states and union territories were being published.

On January 31, 2024, during the proceedings, the bench recorded that prima facie it was of the view that the orders of the review committee must be published, not the deliberations of the committee need not be published. The Court also orally observed that orders of the review committee “could not be kept in a cupboard”.

In the order dated February 23, 2024, the Court noted that while the prayer of the miscellaneous application did not specifically request the publication of the review committee orders, it acknowledged that these orders also affect the rights of parties. Consequently, the court held that “though it may not be necessary to notify the deliberations of the Reviewing Committee, it will be necessary to publish the final order”. As a result, the application was disposed of.

By emphasizing the necessity of publishing review orders, this order ensures that the review committee oversight remains open to public scrutiny. This promotes trust in governmental actions and safeguards citizens' rights. Such a directive represents a significant stride towards fostering a culture of transparency and accountability in combating illegal and arbitrary internet shutdowns. We are deeply grateful to FMP for granting us the opportunity to assist them in a matter of such paramount importance and for entrusting us in this crucial fight for digital rights!

We are immensely grateful to Advocate Shadan Farasat for leading us in the matter. He was assisted by Advocate Natasha Maheshwari, and IFF’s Legal Team comprising Advocates Gautam Bhatia, Vrinda Bhandari, Abhinav Sekhri, Radhika Roy, and Gayatri Malhotra.  

Important Documents

  1. Order dated 23.02.2024 (link)
  2. Order dated 16.02.2023 (link)
  3. Order dated 30.01.2024 (link)

Subscribe to our newsletter, and don't miss out on our latest updates.

Similar Posts

Your personal data, their political campaign? Beneficiary politics and the lack of law

As the 2024 elections inch closer, we look into how political parties can access personal data of welfare scheme beneficiaries and other potential voters through indirect and often illicit means, to create voter profiles for targeted campaigning, and what the law has to say about it.

6 min read

Press Release: Civil society organisations express urgent concerns over the integrity of the 2024 general elections to the Lok Sabha

11 civil society organisations wrote to the ECI, highlighting the role of technology in affecting electoral outcomes. The letter includes an urgent appeal to the ECI to uphold the integrity of the upcoming elections and hold political actors and digital platforms accountable to the voters. 

2 min read

IFF Explains: How a vulnerability in a government cloud service could have exposed the sensitive personal data of 2,50,000 Indian citizens

In January 2022, we informed CERT-In about a vulnerability in S3WaaS, a platform developed for hosting government websites, which could expose sensitive personal data of 2,50,000 Indians. The security researcher who identified the vulnerability confirmed its resolution in March 2024.

5 min read

Donate to IFF

Help IFF scale up by making a donation for digital rights. Really, when it comes to free speech online, digital privacy, net neutrality and innovation — we got your back!